practice talk
Jun. 28th, 2008 03:22 amMy practice talk went so-so. "Only" 4 people came. I got lots of good feedback.
My talk needed more rhetorical structure (letting audience know what to expect), better motivation, and the scope of our contribution wasn't clear enough.
I find it hard to coordinate the content of the slides with the spoken part without either:
* sounding like I'm just reading the slides, or
* deviating from the slides and presenting information at the wrong time
Are my slides too good?
My talk needed more rhetorical structure (letting audience know what to expect), better motivation, and the scope of our contribution wasn't clear enough.
I find it hard to coordinate the content of the slides with the spoken part without either:
* sounding like I'm just reading the slides, or
* deviating from the slides and presenting information at the wrong time
Are my slides too good?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-28 01:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-28 03:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-28 04:32 pm (UTC)For one of my talks I made annotated powerpoint slides - the annotations are the notes, not the slides: example. I've also toyed with the idea of recording talks lawrence lessig-style, but I don't think I've said anything that's really all that interesting or important.
Slides aren't notes, they're slides. They're not the same. In my humble opinion.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-28 04:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-28 08:07 pm (UTC)Slides are slides, notes are notes.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-28 02:08 pm (UTC)Good presenters use the slides as more of a locating device. As in, "Aha! I am on this slide, therefore I present this information with this lead-in to the next slide."
It sounds like you should trim your slides and practice the content that you want to be on each one or within each section of a few.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-28 02:48 pm (UTC)You're probably presenting the sort of talk that really needs slides; in that case, I would suggest (as a sort of extreme, strawman suggestion, not necessarily meant to be taken) using the slides only for those things that _must_ be on slides, because you can't effectively present them verbally: diagrams, possibly code snippets if you use code, pictures, etc.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-28 03:00 pm (UTC)Gustavo: If there's actual text on a slide, you'd better intend to read it verbatim, for two reasons: (1) because you will, even if you try not to; (2) because otherwise the audience will try to listen *and* try to read, and end up failing at both (or, more seasoned attendees will shortcut this and just tune out).
Of course, too much text and you turn into a dreadful drone, so all you can get away with are maybe a quote, and a few keywords. Maybe a phrase, but only rarely.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-28 03:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-12 05:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-12 05:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-12 06:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-14 06:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-16 09:49 am (UTC)Surely you're not suggesting drawing argument maps while presenting the talk??
Are you www.cs.brown.edu/~casey ?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-26 06:01 pm (UTC)