![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
If you've seen old (English?) documents, you might have seen that they used two forms of S, one of which looked like an "f" or an integral sign.
Here's why
Google freaks, I challenge you to find a page with a better explanation.
Btw, to this day, it seems the British like to write their numbers floating around, with for example, the loops of "6" and "9" aligned and the 1 as "I", including a small, round "0" and the decimal point in mid-height (higher than most of the "9").
Oh, and the Dutch write funny "8"s, which look kind of like a cursive "g" with loose ends.
Americans write "9"s with a tail straight down (I learned this from my PalmPilot), and if their "1"s have an upper tail, then they MUST have a "base" otherwise it would be interpreted as a "7" (not so in Brazil, where "7"s must necessarily have a slant).
Btw, does anyone still cross their "7"s?
Here's why
Google freaks, I challenge you to find a page with a better explanation.
Btw, to this day, it seems the British like to write their numbers floating around, with for example, the loops of "6" and "9" aligned and the 1 as "I", including a small, round "0" and the decimal point in mid-height (higher than most of the "9").
Oh, and the Dutch write funny "8"s, which look kind of like a cursive "g" with loose ends.
Americans write "9"s with a tail straight down (I learned this from my PalmPilot), and if their "1"s have an upper tail, then they MUST have a "base" otherwise it would be interpreted as a "7" (not so in Brazil, where "7"s must necessarily have a slant).
Btw, does anyone still cross their "7"s?
(no subject)
Date: 2004-08-24 08:16 am (UTC)I now warn all visitors to Germany of this, and more than one has thanked me on their return.
I'm a real hero!
(no subject)
Date: 2004-08-24 01:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-08-24 01:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-08-24 02:07 pm (UTC)"IJ" is considered *one* letter, and the can be seen in the capitalization: for example, "IJmuiden". It seems the capital "IJ" was backformed from a lowercase interpretation of the symbol as "ij", rather than "ÿ". Which seems strange.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-08-24 08:18 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-08-24 08:21 am (UTC)Neat topic!
Btw, does anyone still cross their "7"s?
I do!
Many of my math professors in college -- especially older ones & especially European ones -- crossed both z's and 7's. I mostly do the same; I liked its clarity & distinctiveness, so I picked up the habit.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-08-24 09:11 am (UTC)That "f" for "s" explanation is the one I learned in my phonology course last semester--that is, that it was developed to distinguish it from the letters around it. Hand-written Old English was so crowded and uniform that it was hard to read, so the idea of stretching out the "s" like that (as I understand) was to separate the word around it more easily.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-08-24 12:24 pm (UTC)And I've seen the British numerals in page numbers in books... then again, it's possible they were British books.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-08-24 01:40 pm (UTC)I remember noticing in Hungary that people wrote their numbers differently. The clearest example was the "1", which they do like most Europeans seem to, with a long tail at the top and no base. (Sometimes the tail at the top is almost as long as the vertical bar, so it looks to me like a wedge of some sort rather than a number.) I can't remember any of the other digit differences, but I also remember being confused because they write their accents interchangeably as either acute, grave, or just a ' after the letter.
I hadn't noticed that my 9's were different from printed ones until you pointed that out - I just assumed the tail was always vertical.
And I hadn't really made much notice of those British numerals until you mentioned them - I just thought the book was printed in a slightly odd font!
(no subject)
Date: 2004-08-24 03:29 pm (UTC)And I often make a 1 with a 'hat' but without a 'base'; my 1's are very inconsistent, though. Oh, and my 9's are usually curved, not straight-down.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-08-24 03:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-08-24 04:28 pm (UTC)No really.
I had my own zine in the mid-'90s, and this was before middle-class families started getting really fancy computer equipment, so layout was generally done by hand, and all pieces were either written by hand or on typewriters. So anyway, I felt kind of a peer pressure to have distinctive handwriting. Most of my fellow zine publishers had cool, unique handwriting, and "normal"-looking handwriting was quite rare. There even seemed to be a direct correlation between normal handwriting and a zine's unpopularity.
So ANYWAY. When I was about 16 or so I started cultivating my own particular handwriting style, which is why even to this day I write some characters in a very un-American way.
Although, now that I think about it, my handwriting started getting "weird" when I was about 13 years old. I had a Japanese pen pal, and I loved the way she made 9's. I started writing mine like that, which really annoyed my math teacher because it was hard for her to read them. I also started making weird lowercase a's when I was 14, when I read some goth fanzine and loved the way the author drew them.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-08-25 01:13 am (UTC)A guy in the physics department of the University in Eindhoven always does an experiment during the intro week. A bunch of fresh students and some 2nd/3rd years are given the task of writing some stuff on a blackboard. They don't know what the purpose is, but in the end the guy reveals he noticed that new students do NOT cross their z's, while by the second year almost everybody does.
He then checks the writings on the blackboard, and it invariably turns out he is right: The freshmen have uncrossed z's, and the 2nd and 3rd years have crossed z's.