gusl: (Default)
[personal profile] gusl
Why don't the protocols between laptops and the access points adapt to their distance?

The weaker the signal gets, the more redundant the protocol should become, promoting the optimal level of error-correction.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-06-12 06:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peamasii.livejournal.com
It might be cheaper to just broadcast a stronger signal.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-06-12 06:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gustavolacerda.livejournal.com
If they were designed properly, this would be very cheap at reasonable distances. I would like to see graphs or formulas of bit-reliability vs distance, and (since I can't be bothered to figure it out again) bit-reliability vs amount of redundancy necessary to achieve a given word reliability (e.g. 99.9%).

(no subject)

Date: 2006-06-12 07:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peamasii.livejournal.com
802.11 is probably designed by a consortium of telecoms, so what can you expect, miracles?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-06-12 09:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] smandal.livejournal.com
They do (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/802.11#802.11b)

February 2020

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags