Aug. 8th, 2008

gusl: (Default)
* sweet syntactic sugar for matrix operations (transpose, submatrix, etc.)
* very easy to write unreadable code, full of poorly-named variables
* the semantics seems to be unnecessarily complex
* argh, please please let me define nameless functions, on the fly!

I know how to do entry-wise application (i.e. "mapcar" for the Lispers) when it's an infix operator: e.g. use ".*" instead of "*". But I can't do this for my own functions, and need to write for-loops.

A very odd thing: apparently, functions can't refer to constants/variables defined outside of it (the only constants allowed seem to be literals such as "1" and pre-defined constants, such as "pi").

Hopefully, I'm missing something.

February 2020

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags