gusl: (Default)
[personal profile] gusl
if you use a Gaussian kernel for density estimation, are you still in non-parametric-land?

(no subject)

Date: 2008-02-17 07:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gustavolacerda.livejournal.com
This may be a trivial point, but it's easy to define a family of distributions parameterized by the set of data points, and the parameters of the Gaussian kernels.

Of course, you could also parameterize the family of computable distributions with the TM that produces each distribution...
Edited Date: 2008-02-17 07:55 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2008-02-17 09:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cdtwigg.livejournal.com
But since you don't know a priori how many data points you'll be seeing, you can't make any statement about the dimensionality of the parameter space. Thus: the probability distribution your density estimator could potentially compute is completely arbitrary (could lie anywhere in an infinite-dimensional function space), and hence is not parametric.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-02-17 10:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gustavolacerda.livejournal.com
finite-dimensional: parametric
infinite-dimensional: nonparametric
?

If so, distributions over finite sets are always parametric. I think I can say something stronger here.

Amazing text..

Date: 2008-04-05 09:30 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
thanks much, man

February 2020

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags