Creativity
Apr. 15th, 2003 05:03 pmConsider the analogy:
music <-> software
music composition <-> programming / software design
visualizing this analogy, we extrapolate using concepts we know about music and software:
notes ~> commands / expressions (depending on the paradigm)
...
...
and so on until we reach an interesting idea
...
...
music reuse <- software reuse (INTERESTING IDEA)
Do composers reuse musical patterns from other pieces? Could this idea allow higher-level composition (meta-composition?)?
Is it perhaps the case that good composers are those who, though experience, learn to automate low-level processes, thus greatly optimizing their composition? If so, maybe computers can help the beginning composer be more like an expert.
What about the "visualization" that experienced composers have? I have a feeling that no computer visualization can be a substitute to the person's own image of the composition, but I remain a technological optimist by default.
we can then explore this idea:
music composition patterns <- software design patterns
Now we ask: patterns are both about the content of the software and the processes (sequences of steps, schedules, etc.) we use to create it. It seems that experts master these two skills. Can computers help us with them?
Marvin Minsky on creativity:
Could Computers Be Creative?
I plan to answer "no" by showing that there's no such thing as "creativity'' in the first place. I don't believe there's any substantial difference between ordinary thought and creative thought. Then why do we think there's a difference? I'll argue that this is really not a matter of what's in the remind of the artist---but of what's in the mind of the critic: the less one understands an artist's mind the more creative seems the work the artist does.
music <-> software
music composition <-> programming / software design
visualizing this analogy, we extrapolate using concepts we know about music and software:
notes ~> commands / expressions (depending on the paradigm)
...
...
and so on until we reach an interesting idea
...
...
music reuse <- software reuse (INTERESTING IDEA)
Do composers reuse musical patterns from other pieces? Could this idea allow higher-level composition (meta-composition?)?
Is it perhaps the case that good composers are those who, though experience, learn to automate low-level processes, thus greatly optimizing their composition? If so, maybe computers can help the beginning composer be more like an expert.
What about the "visualization" that experienced composers have? I have a feeling that no computer visualization can be a substitute to the person's own image of the composition, but I remain a technological optimist by default.
we can then explore this idea:
music composition patterns <- software design patterns
Now we ask: patterns are both about the content of the software and the processes (sequences of steps, schedules, etc.) we use to create it. It seems that experts master these two skills. Can computers help us with them?
Marvin Minsky on creativity:
Could Computers Be Creative?
I plan to answer "no" by showing that there's no such thing as "creativity'' in the first place. I don't believe there's any substantial difference between ordinary thought and creative thought. Then why do we think there's a difference? I'll argue that this is really not a matter of what's in the remind of the artist---but of what's in the mind of the critic: the less one understands an artist's mind the more creative seems the work the artist does.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-04-15 01:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-04-15 02:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-04-15 03:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-04-15 03:30 pm (UTC)now in the case of free jazz, that's where those guys where actually trying to go in my opinion, out beyond logic. although i am not so sure whether any of them coltrane and coleman in particular would say that they succeded. my guess is the avergae person would say yes. *smile*
(no subject)
Date: 2003-04-15 03:25 pm (UTC)good point about visual art, i stated that badly, the music definitely has fooled folks but the art i am not sure, but there is computer generated art as shown above.
link to the program that made that: http://www.kurzweilcyberart.com/
(no subject)
Date: 2003-04-16 08:12 am (UTC)I heard of this tool (or at least the research project), but not much in almost a decade or so.
And Kurzweil's poetry software is also definitely neat.
Re:
Date: 2003-04-16 02:22 pm (UTC)yeah sometimes i am not quite sure what to make of kurzweil.