gusl: (Default)
[personal profile] gusl
I previously inquired about a natural measure of "hyperplane similarity". But what I meant was "flat similarity": hyperplanes are flats with codimension 1, which makes this easy (we can simply take the dot product of the unit normals)

So again:
(1) What is a natural measure of flat similarity? Let's call our flats V and W. WOLOG, let's assume that V and W go through the origin.

[livejournal.com profile] rdore proposed that projecting to the orthogonal complement of V ∩ W won't change the answer. However, in general this won't give you vectors. Can we instead pick an arbitrary plane that is orthogonal to both flats (i.e. a 2D subspace of the above), thus ensuring that the projections are vectors?

So here's another basic question:

(2) Given two flats that go through the origin (with dimension m and n), what is the (a) maximum, and the (b) minimum/typical dimension of their intersection?

Thanks to Don Sheehy, I learned that the space of k-flats forms a manifold known as the Grassmannian, in which we can talk about geodesics. Geodesics give at least a partial order, which may be a first step towards a metric.

I'm feeling generally shocked at my ignorance of geometry. Here are some concepts to study:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plücker_coordinates
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_bundle
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauss_map
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_curvature
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_projective_plane
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

February 2020

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags