randomness-deficiency and game theory
Jun. 19th, 2009 01:08 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
guslRandomness is a finite resource. People seem to have less of it than computers. (I'd say this is a form of "bounded rationality")
What does this imply about game theory, namely mixed strategies?
UPDATE: do correlated equilibria extend classical game theory in the required way?
What does this imply about game theory, namely mixed strategies?
UPDATE: do correlated equilibria extend classical game theory in the required way?