gusl: (Default)
[personal profile] gusl
Open Proofs and Open Terms: a Basis for Interactive Logic

also, I'll try to dig out my introductory letter to the FOM... where I discuss my "radical" beliefs regarding proofs, e.g. "it should not be hard to write a formal proof if you have the right tools".

A question which may be obvious to you logicians:
Show me an axiomatic system where all axioms are independent, yet some theorems have two or more proofs, which are not equivalent in a simple way (i.e. there is no simple normalization). I strong feel that there isn't such a system, but many people strongly feel otherwise (they are probably right).

Can anyone enlighten me here?
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

February 2020

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags