WARNING: The following is not very interesting.
Philosophy of Mathematics
Discuss: "Realism-in-truth-value leads to a normative philosophy of mathematics"
Philosophy of Mathematics
Discuss: "Realism-in-truth-value leads to a normative philosophy of mathematics"
A normative philosophy of mathematics is one which prescribes how one should do mathematics.
A mathematician is a realist-in-truth-value iff he believes that forall statements phi about mathematics (phi \/ ~phi).
Such a mathematician is likely to believe in the following norm: the goal of a mathematician should be to determine whether phi or ~phi is the case for whatever phi they are working on. Thus realism in truth-value automatically leads to this norm.
How is such a mathematician to deal with the Continuum Hypothesis, given that both CH and ~CH are consistent with core mathematics? One possibility is to have method of deciding which one is true, e.g. intuition; but he may even simply acknowledge that we don't know and can never know which of phi or ~phi is the true one, while still maintaining that exactly one of them is true.
To such a mathematician, intuitionistic mathematics is overly restrictive, because to him, all proofs of ~~phi are actually proofs of phi. The structure of intuitionistic mathematics, however, may still be an interesting object of mathematical study; and as in all other areas of mathematics, our realist-in-truth-value will attempt to determine where phi or ~phi is the case for each question under investigation phi. And in this sense, he would be no different from intuitionists, who tend to do their meta-reasoning classically while keeping a straight face.