more on being a nit-picker
Oct. 28th, 2008 10:07 pmTo further reinforce my self-image, yesterday, one of the top students in the graduate machine learning class told me: "it's always like this: first I understand something, then I go talk to you, then I realize that I really don't understand it."
I do take some pride in this. Especially when I catch a professor going off the rails, which I think happened 3 times with my favourite prof within the last month.
I think this cognitive style is related to the same detail-orientedness that makes me a good proof-reader. Call it missing the forest for the trees, if you want. One could also view this as intellectual paranoia/self-defense. I prefer to view it positively, as independence and non-conformity.
Of course, I'm far from a formalist when expressing my own intuitions, and I can get annoyed at nitpicking ant-fuckers like myself.
I wonder if my trait could be partly explained by my intuitions and what I consider obvious being very different from most people... with the result that I feel the need for formal precision, as a way of resolving disagreements.
I do take some pride in this. Especially when I catch a professor going off the rails, which I think happened 3 times with my favourite prof within the last month.
I think this cognitive style is related to the same detail-orientedness that makes me a good proof-reader. Call it missing the forest for the trees, if you want. One could also view this as intellectual paranoia/self-defense. I prefer to view it positively, as independence and non-conformity.
Of course, I'm far from a formalist when expressing my own intuitions, and I can get annoyed at nitpicking ant-fuckers like myself.
I wonder if my trait could be partly explained by my intuitions and what I consider obvious being very different from most people... with the result that I feel the need for formal precision, as a way of resolving disagreements.