![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I am somewhat worried that the Ubuntu installer will either overwrite my WinXP Recovery partition (provided by HP), or put its own bootloader before one gets a chance to hit F11, preventing access to the Recovery Partition. My goal is to triple-boot: frequently boot into (1) Ubuntu and (2) WinXP, and very infrequently into (3) Recovery Partition.
Some claim that F11 is a BIOS feature, and thus safe. Others say that *not* deleting the Recovery Partition can cause boot problems.
Running cfdisk from the Live CD, I see that I have two partitions:
* sda1: NTFS, ~72.5GB
* sda2: W95 FAT32 (LBA), ~7.5GB
I think sda2 is the recovery partition; I find it a bit surprising that it's FAT.
UPDATE: This is exactly what I'm asking for, except that I have an HP, not an Acer. 'meierfra' suggests adding Ubuntu to the Windows bootloader.
Alternatively, 'pumalite' suggests installing grub to the partition, rather than to the MBR, and booting with SuperGrub. (This sounds annoying; imagine going through 2 boot screens every time you restart your machine) But none of this should be necessary if the "F11 Restore" is a BIOS feature, as some people claimed.
Some claim that F11 is a BIOS feature, and thus safe. Others say that *not* deleting the Recovery Partition can cause boot problems.
Running cfdisk from the Live CD, I see that I have two partitions:
* sda1: NTFS, ~72.5GB
* sda2: W95 FAT32 (LBA), ~7.5GB
I think sda2 is the recovery partition; I find it a bit surprising that it's FAT.
UPDATE: This is exactly what I'm asking for, except that I have an HP, not an Acer. 'meierfra' suggests adding Ubuntu to the Windows bootloader.
Alternatively, 'pumalite' suggests installing grub to the partition, rather than to the MBR, and booting with SuperGrub. (This sounds annoying; imagine going through 2 boot screens every time you restart your machine) But none of this should be necessary if the "F11 Restore" is a BIOS feature, as some people claimed.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 05:53 am (UTC)Is this doable inside Windows?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 05:59 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 06:07 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 06:32 am (UTC)dd if=/dev/sda of=my_mbr.img bs=512 count=1
(replacing sda with whatever your hard disk raw device is, and changing the of parameter to point to wherever you want the mbr copy)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 06:39 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 06:49 am (UTC)/dev/sda
/dev/sdb
...
/dev/hda
/dev/hdb
...
It's unlikely your hard disk will be anything else.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 09:14 am (UTC)I tried fdisk -l on those 4. Results: cannot open /dev/sd*, and for /dev/hd*, it returned empty.
I can see /dev/sdb1, but that's my external HD. Since I booted from a CD, I suspect the HD never mounted...
dmesg returns a huge list of stuff.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 09:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 01:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 05:39 pm (UTC)I'm saving it to the external HD. Would it be easy to recover my MBR now, in case it gets damaged?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-28 12:59 am (UTC)What tool can I use to double-check what an MBR image has?
Thanks!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-28 01:09 am (UTC)If you ever need to restore it, just do something like:
dd if=/path/to/image.img of=/dev/sda
(or whatever the devicename is). Don't do this unless you have to!